A synthesis of many levels of constraints as a modern view of development

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (4):498-499 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX


The debate of nativisim versus empiricism is over the relative importance of evolutionary versus ontogenetic mechanisms. This is mostly seen today as a false dichotomy. The synthesis of these positions provides a modern viewpoint of grounded category formation. This combined view places equal importance on feedback between these levels in guiding development, and is more appropriately compared to culturalist positions.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 74,429

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Levelling the Levels.Matt Lee - 2009 - In Edward Willatt & Matt Lee (eds.), Thinking Between Deleuze and Kant: A Strange Encounter. Continuum.
Synthesis and Selection: Wynne-Edwards' Challenge to David Lack.Mark E. Borrello - 2003 - Journal of the History of Biology 36 (3):531-566.
The Modern Synthesis: Its Scope and Limits.Elliott R. Sober - 1982 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1982:314 - 321.
Mutationism and the Dual Causation of Evolutionary Change.Arlin Stoltzfus - 2006 - Evolution and Development 8 (3):304-317.
An Extended Synthesis for Evolutionary Biology.Massimo Pigliucci - 2009 - Annals of the New York Academy of Science 1168:218-228.
Are Punctuationists Wrong About the Modern Synthesis?Benton M. Stidd - 1985 - Philosophy of Science 52 (1):98-109.


Added to PP

10 (#881,849)

6 months
2 (#277,237)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references