Synthese 198 (9):1-21 (2020)

Jonathan Egeland
University of Stavanger
In this article, I argue that access internalism should replace preservationism, which has been called “a received view” in the epistemology of memory, as the standard position about memorial justification. My strategy for doing so is two-pronged. First, I argue that the considerations which motivate preservationism also support access internalism. Preservationism is mainly motivated by its ability to answer the explanatory challenges posed by the problem of stored belief and the problem of forgotten evidence. However, as I will demonstrate, access internalism also has the resources to provide plausible solutions to those problems. Second, I argue that preservationism faces a couple of problems which access internalism avoids. Doing so, I present a new scenario which, on the one hand, functions as a counterexample to preservationism, and, on the other hand, provides intuitive support for access internalism. Moreover, I also demonstrate how preservationism, in light of recent research in cognitive psychology, is vulnerable to skepticism about memorial justification, whereas access internalism remains unthreatened.
Keywords Memory  memorial justification  access internalism  reliabilism  preservationism
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11229-020-02604-4
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Knowledge and its Limits.Timothy Williamson - 2000 - Oxford University Press.
The Meaning of 'Meaning'.Hillary Putnam - 1975 - Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science 7:131-193.
The Structure of Empirical Knowledge.Laurence BonJour - 1985 - Cambridge, MA, USA: Harvard University Press.

View all 81 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Access Internalism.George Pappas - 2006 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 6 (2):159-169.
Preservationism in the Epistemology of Memory.Matthew Frise - 2017 - Philosophical Quarterly 67 (268).
Justification, Internalism, and Cream Cheese.Anthony Brueckner - 2009 - Philosophical Papers 38 (1):13-20.
Access Internalism and the Guidance Deontological Conception of Justification.Ram Neta - 2016 - American Philosophical Quarterly 53 (2):155-168.
Why Justification Matters.Declan Smithies - 2015 - In David Henderson & John Greco (eds.), Epistemic Evaluation: Point and Purpose in Epistemology. Oxford University Press. pp. 224-244.
Access Externalism.John Gibbons - 2006 - Mind 115 (457):19-39.
Deontologism and Internalism in Epistemology.Howard Benjamin Shaeffer - 1999 - Dissertation, University of California, Santa Barbara


Added to PP index

Total views
182 ( #63,503 of 2,499,007 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
30 ( #29,243 of 2,499,007 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes