Answering Bayle's Question: Religious Belief in the Moral Philosophy of the Scottish Enlightenment

In Daniel Garber & Steven Nadler (eds.), Oxford Studies in Early Modern Philosophy Volume 1. Oxford University Press (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Bayle on the (Ir)rationality of Religious Belief.Kristen Irwin - 2013 - Philosophy Compass 8 (6):560-569.
Postscript.Paul Wood - 2015 - In Aaron Garrett & James Anthony Harris (eds.), Scottish Philosophy in the Eighteenth Century, Volume I: Morals, Politics, Art, Religion. Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.
The Cambridge Companion to the Scottish Enlightenment (review).James Anthony Harris - 2006 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 44 (3):479-480.
The Cambridge Companion to the Scottish Enlightenment (review). [REVIEW]James A. Harris - 2006 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 44 (3):479-480.
Reidianism in Contemporary English-Speaking Religious Epistemology.Peter Byrne - 2011 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 3 (2):267 - 284.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-05-25

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Hutcheson's Theory of Obligation.Michael Walschots - 2022 - Journal of Scottish Philosophy 20 (2):121-142.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references