What's a face worth: Noneconomic factors in game playing

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (2):162-163 (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Where behavior defies economic analysis, one explanation is that individuals consider more than the immediate payoff. We present evidence that noneconomic factors influence behavior. Attractiveness influences offers in the Ultimatum and Dictator Games. Facial resemblance, a cue of relatedness, increases trusting in a two-node trust game. Only by considering the range of possible influences will game-playing behavior be explained.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Game-players and game-playing: a response to kreider.Richard Royce - 2013 - Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 40 (2):225-239.
Game Theory: A Very Short Introduction.Ken Binmore - 2007 - Oxford University Press.
À quel jeu joues-tu sur Facebook?Olivier Rampnoux & Valérie-inés de la Ville - 2011 - Hermès: La Revue Cognition, communication, politique 59 (1):, [ p.].
Two Kinds of Games.Filip Kobiela - 2011 - Acta Universitatis Carolinae Kinanthropologica 47 (1):61-67.
Business and game-playing: The false analogy. [REVIEW]Daryl Koehn - 1997 - Journal of Business Ethics 16 (12-13):1447-1452.
Playing the Language Game Game.John Baker - 1981 - Modern Schoolman 58 (3):185-193.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
34 (#456,993)

6 months
10 (#257,583)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?