Uncertainty and the ethics of clinical trials

Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 27 (2):149-167 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A probabilistic explication is offered of equipoise and uncertainty in clinical trials. In order to be useful in the justification of clinical trials, equipoise has to be interpreted in terms of overlapping probability distributions of possible treatment outcomes, rather than point estimates representing expectation values. Uncertainty about treatment outcomes is shown to be a necessary but insufficient condition for the ethical defensibility of clinical trials. Additional requirements are proposed for the nature of that uncertainty. The indecisiveness of our criteria for cautious decision-making under uncertainty creates the leeway that makes clinical trials defensible.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 106,621

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Articulating and responding to uncertainties in clinical research.Benjamin Djulbegovic - 2007 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 32 (2):79 – 98.
Community equipoise and the architecture of clinical research.Jason H. T. Karlawish & John Lantos - 1997 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 6 (4):385-.
What makes placebo-controlled trials unethical?Franklin G. Miller & Howard Brody - 2002 - American Journal of Bioethics 2 (2):3 – 9.
Clinical Equipoise: Actual or Hypothetical Disagreement?Scott Gelfand - 2013 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 38 (6):590--604.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
103 (#219,608)

6 months
6 (#730,479)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Sven Ove Hansson
Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm