The Point and Perils of Public Engagement

Philosophy Now 95:6-7 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Michael Hand considers the pros and cons of courting media attention.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

ISBN(s)

09615970

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Machineries for Making Publics: Inscribing and De-scribing Publics in Public Engagement.Ulrike Felt & Maximilian Fochler - 2010 - Minerva 48 (3):219-238.
Climate ethics: Structuring deliberation by means of logical argument mapping.Michael H. G. Hoffmann - 2011 - Journal of Speculative Philosophy 25 (1):64-97.
The Balance Between Expertise and Authority in Citizen Engagement About New Biotechnology.David Castle - 2006 - Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 9 (3):1-13.
What Constitutes Adequate Public Consultation? Xenotransplantation Proceeds in Australia.Peta S. Cook - 2011 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 8 (1):67-70.
Nanotechnology: a new regime for the public in science?Bernadette Bensaude-Vincent - 2012 - Scientiae Studia 10 (SPE):85-94.
Publics in the Making: Mediating Different Methods of Engagement and the Publics These Construct: Commentary on: “Technologies of Democracy: Experiments and Demonstrations”. [REVIEW]Alison Mohr - 2011 - Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (4):667-672.
Avoiding empty rhetoric: Engaging publics in debates about nanotechnologies.Renee Kyle & Susan Dodds - 2009 - Science and Engineering Ethics 15 (1):81-96.
The Broad Challenge of Public Engagement in Science.Rinie Est - 2011 - Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (4):639-648.
The Broad Challenge of Public Engagement in Science: Commentary on: “Constitutional Moments in Governing Science and Technology”.Rinie van Est - 2011 - Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (4):639-648.
The Perils of Being Public.Kent McElhatian - 2001 - Business Ethics 15 (2):6-6.
Community engagement to facilitate, legitimize and accelerate the advancement of nanotechnologies in australia.Kristen Lyons & James Whelan - 2010 - NanoEthics 4 (1):53-66.
On nanotechnology and ambivalence: The politics of enthusiasm. [REVIEW]Matthew Kearnes & Brian Wynne - 2007 - NanoEthics 1 (2):131-142.
Local dialogue heard around the world.Susan Collins, Michael Kersey & Cindy Savage - 2007 - World Futures 63 (5 & 6):353 – 364.
Rethinking the personal and the political: Feminist activism and civic engagement.Theresa Man Ling Lee - 2007 - Hypatia 22 (4):163-179.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-07-22

Downloads
14 (#961,492)

6 months
1 (#1,533,009)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Michael Hand
University of Birmingham

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references