Two Envelopes and Binding

Australasian Journal of Philosophy 96 (3):508-518 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper describes a way of defending a modification of Eckhardt's [2013] solution to the Two Envelopes Paradox. The defence is based on ideas from Arntzenius, Elga, and Hawthorne [2004].

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Paradox Lost, but in which Envelope?Olav Gjelsvik - 2002 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 2 (3):353-362.
Where the Sum of Our Expectation Fails Us: The Exchange Paradox.John Norton - 1998 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 79 (1):34-58.
Where the sum of our expectation fails us: The exchange paradox.John Norton - 1998 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 79 (1):34–58.
Perspectives on a Pair of Envelopes.Piers Rawling - 1997 - Theory and Decision 43 (3):253-277.
A note on the two envelopes problem.P. Rawling - 1994 - Theory and Decision 36 (1):97-102.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-10-26

Downloads
40 (#387,619)

6 months
10 (#257,583)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Casper Storm Hansen
Institute of Philosophy, Chinese Academy of Sciences

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Frege.Michael Dummett - 1973 - Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Frege: Philosophy of Mathematics.Michael DUMMETT - 1991 - Philosophy 68 (265):405-411.
The Two-Envelope Paradox.John Broome - 1995 - Analysis 55 (1):6 - 11.
The two-envelope paradox.Michael Clark & Nicholas Shackel - 2000 - Mind 109 (435):415--442.

View all 11 references / Add more references