`Non-scientific realism' about propositional attitudes as a response to eliminativist arguments

Behavior and Philosophy 18 (2):21-31 (1990)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Two arguments are discussed which have been advanced in support of eliminative materialism: the argument from reductionism and the argument from functionalism. It is contended that neither of these arguments is effective if "non-scientific realism" is adopted with regard to commonsense propositional attitude psychology and its embedded notions. "Non-scientific realism," the position that commonsense propositional attitude psychology is an independently legitimate descriptive/explanatory framework, neither in competition with science nor vulnerable to being shown false by science, is defended



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

How not to refute eliminative materialism.Kenneth A. Taylor - 1994 - Philosophical Psychology 7 (1):101-125.
Scientific realism, scientific practice, and the natural ontological attitude.André Kukla - 1994 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 45 (4):955-975.
Saving eliminativism.Rod Bertolet - 1994 - Philosophical Psychology 7 (1):87-100.
Thoughts, sentences and cognitive science.Andy Clark - 1988 - Philosophical Psychology 1 (3):263-78.
Transcendental arguments against eliminativism.Robert Lockie - 2003 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 54 (4):569-589.
How to be realistic about folk psychology.George Graham & Terence Horgan - 1988 - Philosophical Psychology 1 (1):69-81.


Added to PP

55 (#278,841)

6 months
3 (#902,269)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Barbara Ellen Hannan
University of New Mexico

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references