Journal of Moral Education 46 (2):97-113 (2017)

Hyemin Han
University of Alabama
The present study meta-analyzed 45 experiments with 959 subjects and 463 activation foci reported in 43 published articles that investigated the neural mechanism of moral functions by comparing neural activity between the moral-task and non-moral-task conditions with the Activation Likelihood Estimate method. The present study examined the common activation foci of morality-related task conditions. In addition, this study compared the neural correlates of moral sensibility with the neural correlates of moral judgment, which are the two functional components in the Neo-Kohlbergian model of moral functioning. The results showed that brain regions associated with the default mode network were significantly more active during morality-related task conditions than during non-morality task conditions. These brain regions were also commonly activated in both moral judgment and moral sensibility task conditions. In contrast, the right temporoparietal junction and supramarginal gyrus were found to be more active only during conditions of moral judgment. These findings suggest that the neural correlates of moral sensibility and moral judgment are perhaps commonly associated with brain circuitries of self-related psychological processes, but the neural correlates of those two functional components are distinguishable from each other.
Keywords Meta-analysis  Moral Self  Moral Psychology  Default Mode Network  Social Neuroscience
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2017
DOI 10.1080/03057240.2016.1262834
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Self-Projection and the Brain.Randy L. Buckner & Daniel C. Carroll - 2007 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 11 (2):49-57.
Can Cognitive Processes Be Inferred From Neuroimaging Data?Russell A. Poldrack - 2006 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 10 (2):59-63.
Cortical Midline Structures and the Self.Georg Northoff & Felix Bermpohl - 2004 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 8 (3):102-107.
Summary: What's Possible.James R. Rest & Darcia Narvaez - 1994 - In James R. Rest & Darcia Narváez (eds.), Moral Development in the Professions: Psychology and Applied Ethics. L. Erlbaum Associates.

View all 21 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The Neuroscience of Moral Judgment: Empirical and Philosophical Developments.Joshua May, Clifford I. Workman, Julia Haas & Hyemin Han - 2022 - In Felipe De Brigard & Walter Sinnott-Armstrong (eds.), Neuroscience and Philosophy. Cambridge, USA: MIT Press. pp. 17-47.
Nonadmirable Moral Exemplars and Virtue Development.Koji Tachibana - 2019 - Journal of Moral Education 48 (3):346-357.

View all 14 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

10.5840/Jbee2011813.Suzy Jagger - 2000 - Journal of Business Ethics Education 1 (1):13-30.
Ethical Sensitivity: A Foundation for Moral Judgment.Suzy Jagger - 2011 - Journal of Business Ethics Education 8 (1):13-30.
Depression Affecting Moral Judgment.Luisa Terroni & Renerio Fraguas - 2010 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 33 (4):352-352.
Moral Realism and Moral Judgments.Frederik Kaufman - 1992 - Erkenntnis 36 (1):103 - 112.
Causation in Moral Judgment.Michael Kurak - 2011 - Mind and Matter 9 (2):153-170.
Moral Expertise: Judgment, Practice, and Analysis*: Julia Driver.Julia Driver - 2013 - Social Philosophy and Policy 30 (1-2):280-296.
Beyond Moral Judgment.Alice Crary - 2007 - Harvard University Press.


Added to PP index

Total views
590 ( #13,755 of 2,499,007 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
109 ( #6,349 of 2,499,007 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes