Mind, Matter, and Supervenience: A Reply to Mulhauser

Minds and Machines 11 (2):293-300 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

2004

DOI

10.1023/a:1011224007199

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Mind, Matter, and Supervenience: A Reply to Mulhauser. [REVIEW]Philip P. Hanson - 2001 - Minds and Machines 11 (2):293-300.
Reply to Philip P. Hanson's review of mind out of matter.Gregory R. Mulhauser - 2001 - Minds and Machines 11 (2):301-306.
An end to the controversy? A reply to Rips.Philip N. Johnson-Laird - 1997 - Minds and Machines 7 (3):425-432.
M. Gams, M. Paprzycki and X. Wu, eds., Mind Versus Computer: Were Dreyfus and Winograd Right?, Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, Vol. 43, Amsterdam: IOS Press, 1997, xiii + 235 pp. (paper), ISBN 90-5199-357-9. [REVIEW]Charles E. M. Dunlop - 2000 - Minds and Machines 10 (2):289-296.
Reply to Bringsjord and Ferrucci.André Thayse - 1998 - Minds and Machines 8 (2):311-312.
Bureaucracy and heartlessness: Reply to Dahlbom. [REVIEW]Matthew Elton - 1998 - Minds and Machines 8 (3):419-421.
The syntax of Galileo: Reply to Ray Jackendoff. [REVIEW]James H. Bunn - 2000 - Minds and Machines 10 (1):137-147.
Physics, logic and the phenomenal.Philip P. Hanson - 2000 - Minds and Machines 10 (3):391-400.
Reply to Glymour and Thayse.Selmer Bringsjord & David A. Ferrucci - 1998 - Minds and Machines 8 (2):313-315.
Discreteness and relevance: A reply to Roman poznanski. [REVIEW]Chris Eliasmith - 2002 - Minds and Machines 12 (3):437-438.
Bodily Self-Awareness and the Will: Reply to Power.José Luis Bermúdez - 2001 - Minds and Machines 11 (1):139-142.
Explaining Systematicity: A Reply to Kenneth Aizawa.Robert F. Hadley - 1997 - Minds and Machines 7 (4):571-579.
Goals for a theory of deduction: Reply to Johnson-Laird. [REVIEW]Lance J. Rips - 1997 - Minds and Machines 7 (3):409-424.
The heart of Dennett's philosophy: Reply to Elton. [REVIEW]Bo Dahlbom - 1998 - Minds and Machines 8 (3):415-418.
Models rule, OK? A reply to Fetzer.P. N. Johnson-Laird & Ruth M. J. Byrne - 1999 - Minds and Machines 9 (1):111-118.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-02-20

Downloads
15 (#919,495)

6 months
4 (#818,853)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Philip P. Hanson
Simon Fraser University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references