Learning about right and wrong: Ethics and language

Philosophy 78 (1):25-41 (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The difference between right and wrong is not something that is taught; it is, necessarily, picked up by a child in the course of learning its native language, and parents have no choice about this. In learning the meaning of ‘steal’, for example, the child learns that such actions are wrong. It also develops, through a kind of conditioning, the appropriate feelings and attitudes. The very concept of a reason has a moral content; so that, in acquiring this concept, the child learns what counts as a good reason; and this includes altruistic and other moral reasons, no less than reasons of self-interest.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Wrong Kind of Reason.Pamela Hieronymi - 2005 - Journal of Philosophy 102 (9):437 - 457.
Philosophy and Language Learning.Steinar Bøyum - 2006 - Studies in Philosophy and Education 26 (1):43-56.
Can we talk about ethics anymore?John Hill - 1995 - Journal of Business Ethics 14 (8):585-592.
Being Wrong: Logics for False Belief.Christopher Steinsvold - 2011 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 52 (3):245-253.
Defending the Right To Do Wrong.Ori J. Herstein - 2012 - Law and Philosophy 31 (3):343-365.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
116 (#148,866)

6 months
7 (#350,235)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?