Economics and Philosophy 1 (1):83-99 (1985)
AbstractDiscussions of Karl Popper's falsificationist philosophy of science appear regularly in the recent literature on economic methodology. In this literature, there seem to be two fundamental points of agreement about Popper. First, most economists take Popper's falsificationist method of bold conjecture and severe test to be the correct characterization of scientific conduct in the physical sciences. Second, most economists admit that economic theory fails miserably when judged by these same falsificationist standards. As Latsis states, “the development of economic analysis would look a dismal affair through falsificationist spectacles.”
Similar books and articles
Karl Popper and Economic Methodology: A New Look.Douglas W. Hands - 1985 - Economics and Philosophy 1 (1):83-.
The Methodology of Economic Research Programmes.Douglas W. Hands - 1979 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 9 (3):293.
Comment On D. Wade Hands, “Karl Popper and Economic Methodology: A New Look”.Mark Blaug - 1985 - Economics and Philosophy 1 (2):286-288.
Situational Analysis Beyond Neoclassical Economists.Lawrence A. Boland - 1998 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 28 (4):515-521.
Is Popper's Falsificationist Heuristic a Helpful Resource for Developing Critical Thinking?Chi‐Ming Lam - 2007 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 39 (4):432–448.
Review Symposium : Douglas W. Hands G. C. Archibald Joseph Agassi on S. J. Latsis, Ed. Method and Appraisal in Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1976. Pp. VIII + 218. $17.50 the Methodology of Economic Research Programmes. [REVIEW]Douglas W. Hands - 1979 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 9 (3):293-303.
From Analysis/Synthesis to Conjecture/Analysis: A Review of Karl Popper’s Influence on Design Methodology in Architecture.Greg Bamford - 2002 - Design Studies 23 (3):245-61.
Popper, the Rationality Principle and Economic Explanation.D. Wade Hands - 1991 - In G. K. Shaw (ed.), Economics, Culture, and Education: Essays in Honor of Mark Blaug. Edward Elgar. pp. 108-119.
The Problem of Excess Content: Economics, Novelty and a Long Popperian Tale.D. Wade Hands - 1991 - In Mark Blaug & Neil de Marchi (eds.), Appraising Economic Theories: Studies in the Methodology of Research Programs. Edward Elgar. pp. 58-75.
A Regimented and Concise Exposition of Karl Popper’s Critical Rationalist Epistemology.Danny Frederick - 2019 - Cosmos + Taxis 6 (6-7):49-54.
The Problem of Induction and Karl Popper’s Hypothetico-Deductive Methodology: A Critical Evaluation.Oseni Taiwo Afisi - unknown
Reflection Without Rules: Economic Methodology and Contemporary Science Theory.D. Wade Hands - 2001 - Cambridge University Press.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Philosophy of Economics: Past and Future.Daniel M. Hausman - 2021 - Journal of Economic Methodology 28 (1):14-22.
The Structuralist View of Economic Theories: A Review Essay: The Case of General Equilibrium in Particular.D. Wade Hands - 1985 - Economics and Philosophy 1 (2):303-.
Philosophy of Economics: A Retrospective Reflection.Daniel M. Hausman - 2018 - Revue de Philosophie Économique 2:185-202.
Confuting Popper on the Rationality Principle.Robert Nadeau - 1993 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 23 (4):446-467.
Economics, Psychology, and the Unity of the Decision Sciences.Roberto Fumagalli - 2016 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 46 (2):103-128.
References found in this work
Logical Versus Historical Theories of Confirmation.Alan Musgrave - 1974 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 25 (1):1-23.
The Methodological Status of Popper's Rationality Principle.Noretta Koertge - 1979 - Theory and Decision 10 (1-4):83-95.
Metaphysics and the Advancement of Science.J. W. N. Watkins - 1975 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 26 (2):91-121.
On Robert Nozick's 'on Austrian Methodology'.Walter Block - 1980 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 23 (4):397 – 444.