Improving Epistemological Beliefs and Moral Judgment Through an STS-Based Science Ethics Education Program

Science and Engineering Ethics 20 (1):197-220 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This study develops a Science–Technology–Society (STS)-based science ethics education program for high school students majoring in or planning to major in science and engineering. Our education program includes the fields of philosophy, history, sociology and ethics of science and technology, and other STS-related theories. We expected our STS-based science ethics education program to promote students’ epistemological beliefs and moral judgment development. These psychological constructs are needed to properly solve complicated moral and social dilemmas in the fields of science and engineering. We applied this program to a group of Korean high school science students gifted in science and engineering. To measure the effects of this program, we used an essay-based qualitative measurement. The results indicate that there was significant development in both epistemological beliefs and moral judgment. In closing, we briefly discuss the need to develop epistemological beliefs and moral judgment using an STS-based science ethics education program

Similar books and articles

The epistemology of moral disagreement.Richard Rowland - 2017 - Philosophy Compass 12 (2):1-16.
Psychological Foundationalism.Robert Audi - 1978 - The Monist 61 (4):592-610.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-01-22

Downloads
776 (#19,227)

6 months
142 (#22,183)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Hyemin Han
University of Alabama

References found in this work

The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.Thomas S. Kuhn - 1962 - Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Edited by Ian Hacking.
The measurement of moral judgment.Anne Colby - 1987 - New York: Cambridge University Press. Edited by Lawrence Kohlberg.
Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research.Donald Thomas Campbell - 1966 - Chicago,: R. McNally. Edited by Julian C. Stanley & N. L. Gage.

View all 26 references / Add more references