Exclusivist Republicanism and the Non-Monarchical Republic

Political Theory 38 (4):452-482 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The idea that a republic is the only legitimate form of government and that non-elective monarchy and hereditary political privileges are by definition illegitimate is an artifact of late eighteenth century republicanism, though it has roots in the “godly republics” of the seventeenth century. It presupposes understanding a republic to be a non-monarchical form of government. The latter definition is a discursive practice that goes back only to the fifteenth century and is not found in Roman or medieval sources. This article explains how the definition emerged in Renaissance Italy.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,423

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Review Article: Histories of Australian Republicanism.M. Francis - 2001 - History of Political Thought 22 (2):351-362.
“the Monarchical Republic Of Queen Elizabeth I,”.Patrick Collinson - 1987 - Bulletin of the John Rylands Library 69 (2):394-424.
Republican Political Theory and Irish Nationalism.Lee Ward - 2016 - The European Legacy 21 (1):19-37.
Charles renouvier and the conservative republic in France, 1872-9.Mike Hawkins - 2012 - History of Political Thought 33 (1):145-167.
Against reviving republicanism.Geoffrey Brennan & Loren Lomasky - 2006 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 5 (2):221-252.
The Ethos of the Republic and the Reality of Politics.Werner Maihofer - 1990 - In Gisela Bock, Quentin Skinner & Maurizio Viroli (eds.), Machiavelli and Republicanism. Cambridge University Press. pp. 283--292.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-09-30

Downloads
52 (#300,476)

6 months
5 (#638,139)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?