- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Do Moral Philosophers Have to Be Moral?
Theoria 86 (4):433-438 (2020)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
My notes
Similar books and articles
Moral Philosophy, Moral Expertise, and the Argument from Disagreement.Ben Cross - 2015 - Bioethics 30 (3):188-194.
Moral Disagreement among Philosophers.Ralph Wedgwood - 2014 - In Michael Bergmann & Patrick Kain (eds.), Challenges to Moral and Religious Belief: Disagreement and Evolution. Oxford University Press. pp. 23-39.
Why moral philosophers are not and should not be moral experts.David Archard - 2011 - Bioethics 25 (3):119-127.
Moral Realism and Expert Disagreement.Prabhpal Singh - 2020 - Trames: A Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences 24 (3):441-457.
Moral Philosophers Are Moral Experts! A Reply to David Archard.John-Stewart Gordon - 2012 - Bioethics 28 (4):203-206.
Moral Intuitions: Are Philosophers Experts?Kevin Tobia, Wesley Buckwalter & Stephen Stich - 2013 - Philosophical Psychology 26 (5):629-638.
The Wisdom of the Egoist: The Moral and Political Implications of Valuing the Self.Jean Hampton - 1997 - Social Philosophy and Policy 14 (1):21.
A defense of the very idea of moral deference pessimism.Max Lewis - 2020 - Philosophical Studies (8):2323-2340.
Expertise, wisdom and moral philosophers: A response to Gesang.Christopher Cowley - 2012 - Bioethics 26 (6):337-342.
From Folk Morality to Moral Philosophy.J. Peikani - 2014 - Metaphysics (University of Isfahan) 5 (16):129-142.
Analytics
Added to PP
2020-08-29
Downloads
24 (#637,523)
6 months
5 (#652,053)
2020-08-29
Downloads
24 (#637,523)
6 months
5 (#652,053)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Engaging charitable giving: The motivational force of narrative versus philosophical argument.Eric Schwitzgebel, Christopher McVey & Joshua May - forthcoming - Philosophical Psychology:1-36.
Ethical Reasoning: Guidance or Just Rationalization?Sven Ove Hansson - 2021 - Theoria 87 (4):861-865.
References found in this work
The moral behavior of ethics professors: Relationships among self-reported behavior, expressed normative attitude, and directly observed behavior.Eric Schwitzgebel & Joshua Rust - 2014 - Philosophical Psychology 27 (3):293-327.
The moral behavior of ethics professors: Relationships among self-reported behavior, expressed normative attitude, and directly observed behavior.Eric Schwitzgebel - 2014 - Philosophical Psychology 27 (3):293-327.
Do Ethicists and Political Philosophers Vote More Often Than Other Professors?Eric Schwitzgebel & Joshua Rust - 2010 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 1 (2):189-199.
Ethicists' courtesy at philosophy conferences.Eric Schwitzgebel, Joshua Rust, Linus Ta-Lun Huang, Alan T. Moore & D. Justin Coates - 2012 - Philosophical Psychology 25 (3):331 - 340.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-7c76586df8-4c2ch uwo