Authors
Mats J. Hansson
Uppsala Universitet
Abstract
In the debate about human bio-sampling the interests of patients and other sample donors are believed to stand against the interests of scientists and of their freedom of research. Scientists want efficient access to and use of human biological samples. Patients and other donors of blood or tissue materials want protection of their integrity. This dichotomy is reflected in the Swedish law on biobanks, which came into effect 1 January 2003. In this article I argue that if the basic interest of scientists using human biological samples is in increasing knowledge and developing better treatments, and if the concept ‘integrity’ is properly understood, then sample donors should also be interested in promotion of efficiency as well as in the protection of their integrity. The basic premise of this argument is that donors of samples have interests related to the donation and use of samples as well as to the use of the results of the research, that is, new medical products and treatments. They have a role both as donors or participants in research and as end users of the research. I conclude that if access to information acquired through biobank research is strictly limited to researchers, the information is protected by secrecy safeguards through coding and the procedures governing the research are open to public and democratic control, then most research using human biobanks may be carried out on the basis of making general information available when collecting biological samples, without further contact with participants
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1016/j.shpsc.2006.06.006
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 72,634
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Building on Relationships of Trust in Biobank Research.M. G. Hansson - 2005 - Journal of Medical Ethics 31 (7):415-418.
Balancing the Quality of Consent.M. O. Hansson - 1998 - Journal of Medical Ethics 24 (3):182-187.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Biobanks and Feedback.Kadri Simm - 2014 - In Ruth Chadwick, Mairi Levitt & Darren Shickle (eds.), The Right to Know and the Right not to Know. Cambridge University Press. pp. 55-70.
On the Notion of Organisational Integrity.Wim Vandekerckhove - 2010 - Philosophy of Management 9 (1):123-134.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2010-08-30

Total views
25 ( #460,465 of 2,533,691 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #389,210 of 2,533,691 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes