Journal of Medical Ethics 24 (3):182-187 (1998)
AbstractThe rule that one must obtain informed consent is well established in medical ethics and an intrinsic part of clinical practice and of research in biomedicine. However, there is a tendency that the rule today is being applied too rigidly and with too little sensitivity to the values that are at stake in connection with different kinds of research protocols. It is here argued that the quality of consent needs to be balanced against variables such as degree of confidentiality and importance of values at stake, in order to be ethically acceptable. Appropriate information and consent procedures should be adjusted accordingly. Three levels are suggested, ranging from extensively informed consent with both written and oral information, through informed refusal with only a limited amount of information given to, at the other end of the scale, just making relevant information available
Similar books and articles
Can Informed Consent Go Too Far? Balancing Consent and Public Benefit in Research.Lauren C. Milner & David Magnus - 2013 - American Journal of Bioethics 13 (4):1 - 2.
Victimless Conduct and the Volenti Maxim: How Consent Works. [REVIEW]Michelle Madden Dempsey - 2013 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 7 (1):11-27.
Professional organization of physicians: Balancing the cost-quality equation. An introduction.Allen R. Dyer - 1989 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 10 (3):185-193.
Improving the quality of consent to randomised controlled trials by using continuous consent and clinician training in the consent process.P. Allmark - 2006 - Journal of Medical Ethics 32 (8):439-443.
Informed Consent: A Primer for Clinical Practice.Deborah Bowman - 2011 - Cambridge University Press.
Balancing urgency, age and quality of life in organ allocation decisions--what would you do?: a survey.J. E. Stahl, A. C. Tramontano, J. S. Swan & B. J. Cohen - 2008 - Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (2):109-115.
Individual autonomy and the double-blind controlled experiment: The case of desperate volunteers.N. Waller Bruce - 1995 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 20 (1).
Specifying, balancing, and interpreting bioethical principles.Henry S. Richardson - 2000 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 25 (3):285 – 307.
Consent and informational responsibility.Shaun D. Pattinson - 2009 - Journal of Medical Ethics 35 (3):176-179.
Principles and problems in the assessment of quality of life in health care.Ray Fitzpatrick - 1999 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 2 (1):37-46.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
The Ethics of Mentoring.Dennis J. Moberg & Manuel Velasquez - 2004 - Business Ethics Quarterly 14 (1):95-122.
Surgical nurses’ knowledge and practices about informed consent.Elif Akyüz, Hülya Bulut & Mevlüde Karadağ - 2019 - Nursing Ethics 26 (7-8):2172-2184.
Combining efficiency and concerns about integrity when using human biobanks.Mats G. Hansson - 2006 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 37 (3):520-532.
Ethical Issues in Cancer Register Follow-Up of Hormone Treatment in Adolescence.C. M. Hultman, A. -C. Lindgren, M. G. Hansson, J. Carlstedt-Duke, M. Ritzen, I. Persson & H. Kieler - 2009 - Public Health Ethics 2 (1):30-36.
References found in this work
Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Dignity of the Human Being with Regard to the Application of Biology and Medicine: Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine.[author unknown] - 2000 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 25 (2):259-266.