After ideocracy and civil society

Thesis Eleven 128 (1):41-55 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Behind only that of Bronislaw Malinowski, the influence of the Central European polymaths Ernest Gellner and Karl Polanyi on socio-cultural anthropology in the 20th century was profound. Gellner and Polanyi also influenced much wider swathes of scholarship. They belong to different generations and were raised in quite different settings in Prague and Budapest respectively. What these thinkers have in common is a philosophy of history which posits the industrial revolution in northwest Europe as a radical rupture in Weltgeschichte. Polanyi’s ‘great transformation’, with its focus on the economy, corresponds to Gellner’s metaphor of the ‘big ditch’ and focus on a new polity. The cultural homogenization of the nation-state and the disembedding of the economy from society in the era of free trade are two sides of the same coin. This paper argues that these complementary models derive to a considerable degree from the scholars’ background on the margins of industrializing Europe, in the ruins of the Habsburg Empire.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Gellner on Malinowski: Words and Things in Central Europe.Chris Hann - 1996 - Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 48:45-64.
The end and renewal of ideology in Central Europe and in Hungary.Tibor Szabo - 1993 - History of European Ideas 17 (6):747-753.
Liability in the Care of the Elderly.P. Iyer - 2004 - Tradition and Discovery 33 (1):124-131.
The Personal and the Subjective.Marjorie Grene - 1995 - Tradition and Discovery 22 (3):6-16.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-09-03

Downloads
21 (#715,461)

6 months
3 (#1,023,809)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?