When Doctors and Parents Don’t Agree: The story of Charlie Gard

Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 14 (4):461-468 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This discussion follows a series of high profile cases involving a terminally ill child, Charlie Gard. These cases are significant as they trace the complexities that arise when parents and medical teams do not agree as well as addressing the question of whether there is a right to access experimental treatment.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,423

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Letting Charlotte die.M. Brazier - 2004 - Journal of Medical Ethics 30 (6):519-520.
Clinicians' knowledge of informed consent.L. Fisher-Jeffes, C. Barton & F. Finlay - 2007 - Journal of Medical Ethics 33 (3):181-184.
Our right to in vitro fertilisation--its scope and limits.T. Tannsjo - 2008 - Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (11):802-806.
Should Doctors strike?John J. Park & Scott A. Murray - 2014 - Journal of Medical Ethics 40 (5):341-342.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-11-07

Downloads
23 (#666,649)

6 months
3 (#1,002,413)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Social Media: The Unnamed Plaintiff.Bernadette J. Richards - 2018 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 15 (3):309-312.
Power to the People?Michael A. Ashby & Bronwen Morrell - 2017 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 14 (4):457-459.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references