Two theories of morality

Oxford: Published for the British Academy by Oxford University Press (1977)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this expanded version of his Thank-Offering to Britain Fund lectures, delivered at the British Academy in February 1976, Stuart Hampshire compares two radically different conceptions of morality, those of Aristotle and Spinoza, authors, he claims, of the most plausible of all moral philosophies. He discusses the relation between moral intuitions and moral theory, and the contrasting ideas of moral normality and moral conversion. Spinoza's theory of the relation between mind and body is expounded and its relevance to recent theories is explained.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
79 (#206,544)

6 months
4 (#818,853)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Grounding rights and a method of reflective equilibrium.Kai Nielsen - 1982 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 25 (3):277 – 306.
Evolution and the meaning of life.William Grey - 1987 - Zygon 22 (4):479-496.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references