The Return of the Romans

Political Theory 48 (3):390-400 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1177/0090591719876627

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

The Return of the Romans. [REVIEW]Dean Hammer - 2020 - Political Theory 48 (3):390-400.
Roman Political Thought: From Cicero to Augustine.Dean Hammer - 2014 - Cambridge University Press.
Preaching Romans Today.Thomas G. Long - 2004 - Interpretation: A Journal of Bible and Theology 58 (3):265-275.
Aquinas on Natural Law and the Virtues in Biblical Context.Eugene F. Rogers Jr - 1999 - Journal of Religious Ethics 27 (1):29-56.
Aquinas on Natural Law and the Virtues in Biblical Context: Homosexuality as a Test Case.Eugene F. Rogers Jr - 1999 - Journal of Religious Ethics 27 (1):29 - 56.
Faith, righteousness and salvation in Romans.Willem H. Oliver - 2018 - HTS Theological Studies 74 (4):1-6.
Crossing the Rhine: Germany during the Early Principate.Leah Brochu - 2013 - Constellations (University of Alberta Student Journal) 4 (1).
The Romans Donald Dudley: The Romans. Pp. xxiv+316. 33 plates, 5 maps. London: Hutchinson, 1970. Cloth, £3.R. M. Ogilvie - 1972 - The Classical Review 22 (02):250-252.
What Can We Know of What the Romans Knew? Comments on Daryn Lehoux’s What Did the Romans Know? An Inquiry into Science and Worldmaking.Jacqueline Feke - 2012 - Expositions: Interdisciplinary Studies in the Humanities 6 (2):23-32.
Romans 10:5–13 revisited.Willem Oliver - 2015 - HTS Theological Studies 71 (3).
Rome and the Romans Rome and, the Romans. A Survey and Interpretation. By Grant Showerman. Pp. xxii + 463; maps and illustrations. New York: The Macmillan Company, 1931. Cloth, 21s. net. [REVIEW]W. E. Heitland - 1932 - The Classical Review 46 (02):69-70.
Ce qui ne revient pas au meme.Stéphane Habib & Raphaël Zagury-Orly - 2006 - Journal of Jewish Thought and Philosophy 14 (1-2):37-54.
Romans and Blacks Lloyd A. Thompson: Romans and Blacks. Pp. xii + 253. London and Oklahoma: Routledge/Oklahoma University Press, 1989. £25. [REVIEW]Jane F. Gardner - 1990 - The Classical Review 40 (02):395-397.
The Dialectic of Monotheism: St. Paul's “Letter to the Romans”.Aryeh Botwinick - 2008 - Telos: Critical Theory of the Contemporary 2008 (143):113-132.
Paul and Augustine's retrospective self : The relevance of Epistula XXII.Felix Baffour Asiedu - 2001 - Revue d' Etudes Augustiniennes Et Patristiques 47 (1):145-164.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-05-09

Downloads
28 (#536,385)

6 months
9 (#242,802)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references