Should political philosophy be done without metaphysics?

Ethics 99 (4):791-814 (1989)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper, The author discusses rawls's recent argument that the aim of political philosophy is not the pursuit of truth but of "free agreement, Reconciliation through public reason" designed to forge an "overlapping consensus." although the author is prepared to agree that political philosophy should sometimes have this goal, She maintains that there are metaphysical commitments about the nature of human beings underlying philosophy itself which commit the political philosophers to pursuing conditions of freedom and equal respect for all, A pursuit which may fail to create--Even undermine--An overlapping consensus in a community

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,423

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
493 (#36,682)

6 months
36 (#97,290)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Public Reason.Jonathan Quong - 2013 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
What toleration is.Andrew Jason Cohen - 2004 - Ethics 115 (1):68-95.
Liberalism.Gerald Gaus - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

View all 53 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references