There are certain metaphysical theories which present a view of the world and of the position of human-beings within it which have seemed attractive or at least impressive to many irrespective of the arguments that are marshalled in their favour. That is certainly true of Schopenhauer. His identification of the inner nature of reality with the will, and the conclusions which he drew from this as regards the nature of human-beings and their place in the world, have seemed striking and perhaps even illuminating to many thinkers, not all of whom have been philosophers in the most obvious sense and not all of whom have had much concern for the underlying argument that led Schopenhauer to his conclusions. It is in this way too, perhaps, that certain of Schopenhauer's ideas have become well known—his emphasis on the will to live, his pessimism and his views on suicide, and his thoughts about human nature and about sex that have been seen as something of an anticipation of Freud. In recent times attention has also been directed to his influence on Wittgenstein. In all these respects, however, it is Schopenhauer's ideas that have been influential, rather than the argument that underlies them. Indeed it is sometimes said that Schopenhauer was not a very systematic thinker at all. If that seems true it is so in the sense that Kant too has seemed to some unsystematic in the details of his argument. That does not mean that the main structure of the argument is not clear. So it is with Schopenhauer.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S1358246100001570
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,163
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Essays on Freedom of Action.Irving Thalberg - 1975 - Philosophical Review 84 (2):293.
Essays on Freedom of Action.Ted Honderich - 1975 - Mind 84 (333):148-149.
Unconscious Intentions.D. W. Hamlyn - 1971 - Philosophy 46 (175):12 - 22.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Schopenhauer on Action and the Will.D. W. Hamlyn - 1982 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Lectures 13:127-140.
Schopenhauer's Metaphysics of the Will.Gilbert L. Shepard - 1999 - Dissertation, The University of Wisconsin - Madison
Schopenhauer and Freud in Schopenhauer.D. W. Hamlyn - 1988 - Revue Internationale de Philosophie 42 (164):5-17.
Schopenhauer on the Principle of Sufficient Reason: D. W. Hamlyn.D. W. Hamlyn - 1971 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 5:145-162.
Schopenhauer.Robert J. Wicks - 2008 - Wiley-Blackwell.
Schopenhauer.D. W. Hamlyn - 1980 - Routledge.
The Cambridge Companion to Schopenhauer.Christopher Janaway (ed.) - 1999 - Cambridge University Press.


Added to PP index

Total views
11 ( #852,343 of 2,506,527 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,791 of 2,506,527 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes