Economics and Philosophy 5 (2):167-188 (1989)

Abstract
Economic approaches to both social evaluation and decision-making are typically Paretian or utilitarian in nature and so display commitments to both welfarism and consequentialism. The contrast between the economic approach and any rights-based social philosophy has spawned a large literature that may be divided into two branches. The first is concerned with the compatibility of rights and utilitarianism seen as independent moral forces. This branch of the literature may be characterized as an example of the broader debate between the teleological and deontological approaches. The second is concerned with the possibility that substantial rights may be grounded in utilitarianism with the moral force of rights being derived from more basic commitments to welfarism and consequentialism. This branch of the literature may be characterized as an exploration of the flexibility of the teleological approach, and, in particular, its ability to give rise to views more normally associated with the deontological approach. This essay is concerned with the second branch of the literature.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S0266267100002376
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 65,673
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Reasons and Persons.Derek Parfit - 1984 - Oxford University Press.
Morals by Agreement.David Gauthier - 1986 - Oxford University Press.
Taking Rights Seriously.Ronald Dworkin (ed.) - 1977 - Duckworth.

View all 40 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Consequentialism and Moral Psychology.Philip Pettit - 1994 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 2 (1):1 – 17.
The Moral Oracle’s Test.Sven Ove Hansson - 2014 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 17 (4):643-651.
Agricultural Technology, Wealth, and Responsibility.Gene Wunderlich - 1990 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 3 (1):21-35.
Agricultural Technology, Wealth, and Responsibility.Gene Wunderlich - 1990 - Journal of Agricultural Ethics 3 (1):21-35.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Consequentialism and Human Rights.William J. Talbott - 2013 - Philosophy Compass 8 (11):1030-1040.
Distributive Justice and Welfarism in Utilitarianism.Jörg Schroth - 2008 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 51 (2):123-146.
Two Concepts of Rule Utilitarianism.Rex Martin - 2008 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 5 (2):227-255.
From Dialogue Rights to Property Rights: Foundations for Hayek's Legal Theory.Jeremy Shearmur - 1990 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 4 (1-2):106-132.
Utilitarianism and Human Rights.Allan Gibbard - 1984 - Social Philosophy and Policy 1 (2):92.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2010-08-10

Total views
83 ( #133,425 of 2,462,324 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #299,152 of 2,462,324 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes