Logique Et Analyse 228:637-661 (2014)

Yacin Hamami
Vrije Universiteit Brussel
Conversation is one of the main contexts in which we are conducting inquiries. Yet, little attention has been paid so far in pragmatics or epistemology to the process of inquiry in conversation. In this paper, we propose to trigger such an investigation through the development of a formal modelling based on inquisitive pragmatics—a framework offering a semantic representation of questions and answers, along with an analysis of the pragmatic principles that govern questioning and answering moves in conversations geared towards information exchange. Our starting observation is that an interrogative inquiry in a conversation takes the form of a finite sequence of questioning and answering steps, and appears thereby as an inherently temporal process. The central notion of interrogative protocol introduced in this paper precisely aims to capture the temporal dimension of inquiry. Interrogative protocols are defined as branching-time tree structures encoding all the possible sequences of questioning and answering steps—i.e., all the possible inquiry paths—that can subsequently occur in a starting conversational situation in accordance with the principles of inquisitive pragmatics. They provide us with a formal environment to define and investigate the epistemological notions of interrogative inquiry and interrogative consequence in conversational contexts. One of the main interests of the resulting framework is to enable a formal investigation of central epistemological issues relative to interrogative inquiry under the form of computational problems. We frame three key inquiry problems along this line, and we then propose an algorithmic procedure for solving them in the restricted case where the inquirer has at her disposal a finite number of questions in her inquiry. We conclude by relating our approach to Wiśniewski’s Erotetic Search Scenarios and Hintikka’s Interrogative Model of Inquiry.
Keywords Interrogative model of inquiry  Inquisitive pragmatics  Logic of questions
Categories (categorize this paper)
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,172
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Action models in inquisitive logic.Thom van Gessel - 2020 - Synthese 197 (9):3905-3945.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Towards Paraconsistent Inquiry.Can Baskent - 2016 - Australasian Journal of Logic 13 (2).
The Interrogative Model: Historical Inquiry and Explanation.Eric Brook - 2007 - Journal of the Philosophy of History 1 (2):137-159.
On the Logic of Interrogative Inquiry.Jaakko Hintikka & Stephen Harris - 1988 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1988:233-240.
Hintikka’s Interrogative Model and a Logic of Discovery and Justification.Arto Mutanen - 2015 - Acta Baltica Historiae Et Philosophiae Scientiarum 3 (1):27-44.
The Fallacy of Fallacies.Jaakko Hintikka - 1987 - Argumentation 1 (3):211-238.
An Interrogative Model of Inquiry.Stephen Raymond Harris - 1990 - Dissertation, The Florida State University
Action models in inquisitive logic.Thom van Gessel - 2020 - Synthese 197 (9):3905-3945.
Interrogative Belief Revision in Modal Logic.Sebastian Enqvist - 2009 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 38 (5):527-548.


Added to PP index

Total views
32 ( #358,639 of 2,517,897 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #409,045 of 2,517,897 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes