Ideology and Experience: The Legacy of Critical Theory

In Noël Carroll, Laura T. Di Summa & Shawn Loht (eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of the Philosophy of Film and Motion Pictures. Springer. pp. 315-333 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This chapter discusses the contributions of key members and affiliates of the Frankfurt School of Critical Social Theory to the theory of film. Central to all of these contributions, which tend to be based on some account of Marxism, is that they socially and historically locate film production within capitalism and the various ideological constraints of modernity and late modernity. Being highly skeptical of the so-called culture industry, which is said to produce ideology, the school debated avant-garde film practices, including montage. Walter Benjamin’s positive view regarding the key political role of film was subjected to criticism by Theodor W. Adorno yet influenced the artistic movement referred to as New German Cinema. The legacy of the Frankfurt School’s interest in analyzing ideology and the conditions of non-reified experience remains important to contemporary trends in advanced filmmaking.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Adorno and the political.Espen Hammer - 2006 - New York, NY: Routledge.
Theodor W. Adorno.Gerard Delanty (ed.) - 2004 - Thousand Oaks, Calif.: SAGE.
Dialectic of Regression: Theodor W. Adorno and Fritz Lang.Ulrich Plass - 2009 - Telos: Critical Theory of the Contemporary 2009 (149):127-150.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-06-17

Downloads
6 (#1,425,536)

6 months
3 (#1,023,809)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Espen Hammer
Temple University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references