William Astbury and the biological significance of nucleic acids, 1938–1951

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 42 (2):119-128 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Famously, James Watson credited the discovery of the double-helical structure of DNA in 1953 to an X-ray diffraction photograph taken by Rosalind Franklin. Historians of molecular biology have long puzzled over a remarkably similar photograph taken two years earlier by the physicist and pioneer of protein structure William T. Astbury. They have suggested that Astbury’s failure to capitalize on the photograph to solve DNA’s structure was due either to his being too much of a physicist, with too little interest in or knowledge of biology, or to his being misled by an erroneous theoretical model of the gene. Drawing on previously unpublished archival sources, this paper offers a new analysis of Astbury’s relationship to the problem of DNA’s structure, emphasizing a previously overlooked element in Astbury’s thinking: his concept of biological specificity

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Proteins, the chaperone function and heredity.Valeria Mosini - 2013 - Biology and Philosophy 28 (1):53-74.
Crick's notion of genetic information and the ‘central dogma’ of molecular biology.Predrag Šustar - 2007 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 58 (1):13-24.
Genetic information as instructional content.Ulrich E. Stegmann - 2005 - Philosophy of Science 72 (3):425-443.
On the uniqueness of biological research.Adolph Portmann - 1990 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 15 (5):457-472.
The arbitrariness of the genetic code.Ulrich E. Stegmann - 2004 - Biology and Philosophy 19 (2):205-222.
Presence and immortality.Gabriel Marcel - 1967 - Pittsburgh,: Duquesne University Press.
Laws governing degeneration of the genetic code.Manfred Welti - 1986 - Acta Biotheoretica 35 (1-2):3-14.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-09-12

Downloads
89 (#184,948)

6 months
5 (#544,079)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

How to make a university history of science museum: Lessons from Leeds.Claire L. Jones - 2013 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 44 (4):716-724.
The forgotten man of DNA.Matthew Cobb - 2015 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 51:67-69.

Add more citations

References found in this work

What is Life? [REVIEW]E. N. - 1946 - Journal of Philosophy 43 (7):194.
W. T. Astbury, Rosie Franklin, and DNA: A memoir.Mansel Davies - 1990 - Annals of Science 47 (6):607-618.
Nucleoproteins and gene structure.K. G. Stern - 1947 - Scientia 41 (82):74.

Add more references