The Human Embrace: The Love of Philosophy and the Philosophy of Love
Kierkegaard, Cavell, Nussbaum

Pennsylvania State University Press (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Starting from Søren Kierkegaard's insight that fully accepting the human condition requires one to live with the persistent temptation to escape from it, Ronald Hall finds similar concerns reflected in the work of two modern-day philosophers, Stanley Cavell and Martha Nussbaum, who equally find in a philosophy of love and marriage the key to understanding how humans may achieve happiness in the acceptance of their humanity. All three thinkers follow a "logic of paradox" in showing how success in the human quest to be human depends crucially on the struggle humans experience with the ever-present opportunities to pursue alternative paths. What Kierkegaard called "living existentially" can be achieved only after confronting and refusing the possibilities of living in "aesthetic," "ethical," or even "religious" denial of one's true humanity. By creating this dialogue between the nineteenth-century Danish thinker and two eminent twentieth-century philosophers, Hall reveals the continuing relevance of Kierkegaard's thought to our own age and its cogency as an interpretation of the human predicament

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,322

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Self-Love and Neighbor-Love in Kierkegaard's Ethics.Antony Aumann - 2013 - Kierkegaard Studies Yearbook 2013 (1):197–216.
Love Is Not Enough.Stephen N. Dunning - 1995 - Faith and Philosophy 12 (1):22-39.
Love: a history.Simon May - 2011 - New Haven: Yale University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-03-09

Downloads
36 (#431,270)

6 months
11 (#226,803)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Books Received (2000). [REVIEW][author unknown] - 2000 - The Journal of Ethics 4 (4):421-424.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references