Notes and comments: Did Wittgenstein really define 'meaning'?

Heythrop Journal 11 (3):294–298 (1970)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

43. Man kann für eine grosse Klasse von Fallen der Benützung des Wortes ‘Bedeutung’—wenn auch nicht für alle Fälle seiner Benützung—dieses Wort so erklären: Die Bedeutung eines Wortes ist sein Gebrauch in der Sprache.43. For a large class of cases—though not for all—in which we employ the word ‘meaning’ it can be defined thus: the meaning of a word is its use in the language

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Speaking for Oneself: Wittgenstein on Ethics.Matthew Pianalto - 2011 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 54 (3):252-276.
Knowledge and experience.Calvin Dwight Rollins (ed.) - 1962 - [Pittsburgh, Pa.]: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Wittgenstein's lectures on philosophical psychology, 1946-47.Ludwig Wittgenstein - 1988 - Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Edited by P. T. Geach.
Wittgenstein's language.Timothy Binkley - 1973 - The Hague,: M. Nijhoff.
Semantic Realism and the Argument from Motivational Internalism.Alexander Miller - 2012 - In Richard Schantz (ed.), Prospects for Meaning. Walter de Gruyter. pp. 345-362.
Wittgenstein's definition of meaning as use.Garth L. Hallett - 1967 - New York,: Fordham University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
20 (#749,846)

6 months
2 (#1,240,909)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references