Lifting the Veil of Morality: Choice Blindness and Attitude Reversals on a Self-Transforming Survey

PLoS ONE 7 (9):e45457. doi:10.1371/journal.pone (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Every day, thousands of polls, surveys, and rating scales are employed to elicit the attitudes of humankind. Given the ubiquitous use of these instruments, it seems we ought to have firm answers to what is measured by them, but unfortunately we do not. To help remedy this situation, we present a novel approach to investigate the nature of attitudes. We created a self-transforming paper survey of moral opinions, covering both foundational principles, and current dilemmas hotly debated in the media. This survey used a magic trick to expose participants to a reversal of their previously stated attitudes, allowing us to record whether they were prepared to endorse and argue for the opposite view of what they had stated only moments ago. The result showed that the majority of the reversals remained undetected, and a full 69% of the participants failed to detect at least one of two changes. In addition, participants often constructed coherent and unequivocal arguments supporting the opposite of their original position. These results suggest a dramatic potential for flexibility in our moral attitudes, and indicates a clear role for self-attribution and post-hoc rationalization in attitude formation and change.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

De Se Attitudes: Ascription and Communication.Dilip Ninan - 2010 - Philosophy Compass 5 (7):551-567.
Values and Ethics-Related Measures for Management Education.Stephen L. Payne - 1988 - Journal of Business Ethics 7 (4):273 - 277.
Are Businesspeople Buying It?: Measuring Managerial Attitudes Toward Sustainability.Tom E. Thomas & Peter Melhus - 2009 - Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 20:182-193.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-05-02

Downloads
411 (#25,947)

6 months
23 (#44,700)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Petter Johansson
Lund University

References found in this work

Why Do Humans Reason? Arguments for an Argumentative Theory.Dan Sperber - 2011 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34 (2):57.
Abstract.[author unknown] - 2011 - Dialogue and Universalism 21 (4):9-9.

View all 8 references / Add more references