Knowledge of possibility and of necessity

Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 103 (1):1–20 (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX


I investigate two asymmetrical approaches to knowledge of absolute possibility and of necessity--one which treats knowledge of possibility as more fundamental, the other according epistemological priority to necessity. Two necessary conditions for the success of an asymmetrical approach are proposed. I argue that a possibility-based approach seems unable to meet my second condition, but that on certain assumptions--including, pivotally, the assumption that logical and conceptual necessities, while absolute, do not exhaust the class of absolute necessities--a necessity-based approach may be able to do so.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,283

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Another possibility.Catherine Malabou - 2006 - Research in Phenomenology 36 (1):115-129.
Understanding and Essence.Anand Jayprakash Vaidya - 2010 - Philosophia 38 (4):811-833.
Abduction and Modality.Stephen Biggs - 2010 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 83 (2):283-326.
Possibility.Michael Jubien - 2009 - New York: Oxford University Press.


Added to PP

315 (#65,204)

6 months
16 (#160,768)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Perceptual Knowledge of Nonactual Possibilities.Margot Strohminger - 2015 - Philosophical Perspectives 29 (1):363-375.
The contingency of composition.Ross P. Cameron - 2007 - Philosophical Studies 136 (1):99-121.
Williamsonian modal epistemology, possibility-based.Barbara Vetter - 2016 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 46 (4-5):766-795.

View all 22 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references