Healthcare professionals' and researchers' understanding of cancer genetics activities: a qualitative interview study
Journal of Medical Ethics 35 (2):113-119 (2009)
AbstractAims: To describe individuals’ perceptions of the activities that take place within the cancer genetics clinic, the relationships between these activities and how these relationships are sustained. Design: Qualitative interview study. Participants: Forty individuals involved in carrying out cancer genetics research in either a clinical (n = 28) or research-only (n = 12) capacity in the UK. Findings: Interviewees perceive research and clinical practice in the subspecialty of cancer genetics as interdependent. The boundary between research and clinical practice is described as vague or blurred, and this ambiguity is regarded as being sustained by a range of methodological, ethical and economic factors. The implications of these findings for the “therapeutic misconception” are explored. It is argued that while research participation is seen as having therapeutic benefit for individual patients, the interviewees are not labouring under any misconceptions about the relationship between research and clinical care. It is suggested that concepts such as the “therapeutic misconception” may have less relevance in highly technological specialities that are characterised by a developing evidence base
Similar books and articles
Recall of Participation in Research Projects in Cancer Genetics: Some Implications for Research Ethics.Sarah Cooke, Gillian Crawford, Michael Parker, Anneke Lucassen & Nina Hallowell - 2008 - Clinical Ethics 3 (4):180-184.
Ethics and Research Governance: The Views of Researchers, Health-Care Professionals and Other Stakeholders.Nina Hallowell, Sarah Cooke, Gill Crawford, Michael Parker & Anneke Lucassen - 2008 - Clinical Ethics 3 (2):85-90.
Cardiovascular Medicine at Face Value: A Qualitative Pilot Study on Clinical Axiology.Adalberto de Hoyos, Rodrigo Nava-Diosdado, Jorge Mendez, Sergio Ricco, Ana Serrano, Carmen Flores Cisneros, Carlos Macías-Ojeda, Héctor Cisneros, David Bialostozky, Nelly Altamirano-Bustamante & Myriam Altamirano-Bustamante - 2013 - Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine 8:3.
Perspectives and Experience of Healthcare Professionals on Diagnosis, Prognosis, and End-of-Life Decision Making in Patients with Disorders of Consciousness.Catherine Rodrigue, Richard J. Riopelle, James L. Bernat & Eric Racine - 2011 - Neuroethics 6 (1):25-36.
Recruiting Terminally Ill Patients Into Non-Therapeutic Oncology Studies: Views of Health Professionals. [REVIEW]Erika Kleiderman, Denise Avard, Lee Black, Zuanel Diaz, Caroline Rousseau & Bartha Knoppers - 2012 - BMC Medical Ethics 13 (1):33-.
Doctor, What's Wrong?: Making the Nhs Human Again.Sophie Petit-Zeman - 2005 - Routledge.
Psychosocial Care and Patient Autonomy: A Feminist Argument in Support of a "Meaning-Making" Intervention.Jennifer Bell - unknown
Bioethics and Cancer: When the Professional Becomes Personal.Rebecca Dresser - 2011 - Hastings Center Report 41 (6):14-18.
Moral Distress and the Contemporary Plight of Health Professionals.Wendy Austin - 2012 - HEC Forum 24 (1):27-38.
The Sense of Responsibility in the Context of Professional Activities in Medical Genetics.Natália Oliva-Teles - 2011 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 14 (4):397-405.
Professional Codes and Healthcare Decisions: A Pilot Study of the Role Played by Professional Codes of Ethics in Decisionmaking by Healthcare Professionals. [REVIEW]Robert Halliday - 2000 - HEC Forum 12 (1):78-82.
Attitudes Towards Clinical Research Among Cancer Trial Participants and Non-Participants: An Interview Study Using a Grounded Theory Approach.S. M. Madsen, S. Holm & P. Riis - 2007 - Journal of Medical Ethics 33 (4):234-240.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
What German Experts Expect From Individualized Medicine: Problems of Uncertainty and Future Complication in Physician–Patient Interaction.Arndt Heßling & Silke Schicktanz - 2012 - Clinical Ethics 7 (2):86-93.
What German Experts Expect From Individualized Medicine: Problems of Uncertainty and Future Complication in Physician-Patient Interaction.A. Hessling & S. Schicktanz - 2012 - Clinical Ethics 7 (2):86-93.
Physicians’ Communication Patterns for Motivating Rectal Cancer Patients to Biomarker Research: Empirical Insights and Ethical Issues.Sabine Wöhlke, Julia Perry & Silke Schicktanz - 2018 - Clinical Ethics 13 (4):175-188.
How Do Young People with Cystic Fibrosis Conceptualize the Distinction Between Research and Treatment? A Qualitative Interview Study.Jennifer A. Dobson, Emily Christofides, Melinda Solomon, Valerie Waters & Kieran O’Doherty - 2015 - AJOB Empirical Bioethics 6 (4):1-11.
Revealing the Results of Whole-Genome Sequencing and Whole-Exome Sequencing in Research and Clinical Investigations: Some Ethical Issues: Table 1.Nina Hallowell, Alison Hall, Corinna Alberg & Ron Zimmern - 2015 - Journal of Medical Ethics 41 (4):317-321.