A response to Potter and Smiley: Abstraction by recarving

Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 101 (3):339–358 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Recarving content: Hale's final proposal.Michael Potter & Timothy Smiley - 2002 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 102 (3):301–304.
Abstraction and additional nature.Bob Hale & Crispin Wright - 2008 - Philosophia Mathematica 16 (2):182-208.
What Is Wrong with Abstraction?Michael Potter & Peter Sullivan - 2005 - Philosophia Mathematica 13 (2):187-193.
Rejection and valuations.Luca Incurvati & Peter Smith - 2010 - Analysis 70 (1):3 - 10.
Set Theory and its Philosophy: A Critical Introduction.Michael D. Potter - 2004 - Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Abstraction by recarving.Michael Potter & Timothy Smiley - 2001 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 101 (3):327–338.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
41 (#379,234)

6 months
3 (#992,474)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Metaontological Minimalism.Øystein Linnebo - 2012 - Philosophy Compass 7 (2):139-151.
The Composition of Thoughts.Richard Heck & Robert May - 2010 - Noûs 45 (1):126-166.
Abstraction Reconceived.J. P. Studd - 2016 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 67 (2):579-615.
Speaking with Shadows: A Study of Neo‐Logicism.Fraser MacBride - 2003 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 54 (1):103-163.

View all 10 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references