In defense of power ascriptions in psychology

Philosophy of the Social Sciences 8 (3):271-275 (1978)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1177/004839317800800306

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Which immunity to error?Joel Smith - 2006 - Philosophical Studies 130 (2):273-83.
Elusive reasons: A problem for first-person authority.Krista Lawlor - 2003 - Philosophical Psychology 16 (4):549-565.
Two Problems of Moral Objectivity.Steven Ross - 2001 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 1 (1):49-62.
Believing the impossible.Curtis Brown - 1991 - Synthese 89 (3):353-364.
Defense processes can be conscious or unconscious.Matthew H. Erdelyi - 2001 - American Psychologist 56 (9):761-762.
Knowledge Ascriptions.Jessica Brown & Mikkel Gerken (eds.) - 2012 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.
I feel what you think.Alfred Freddoso - manuscript
A defense of statistical power analysis.Brian R. Lashley - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (2):209-210.
I feel what you think.Heidi Maibom - unknown
A Problem with De Re Belief Ascriptions, with a Consequence to Substitutivity.Ari Maunu - 2002 - Philosophia 29 (1-4):411-421.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
14 (#968,362)

6 months
3 (#1,002,413)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references