Genetic dissent and individual compromise

Biology and Philosophy 29 (2):233-239 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Organisms can be treated as optimizers when there is consensus among their genes about what is best to be done, but genomic consensus is often lacking, especially in interactions among kin because kin share some genes but not others. Grafen adopts a majoritarian perspective in which an individual’s interests are identified with the interests of the largest coreplicon of its genome, but genomic imprinting and recombination factionalize the genome so that no faction may predominate in some interactions among kin. Once intragenomic conflicts are recognized, the individual organism can be conceptualized as an arbiter among competing interests within a collective. Organismal adaptation can be recognized without phenotypes being optimized

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Genomic imprinting and culture in mammals.William Michael Brown - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (2):328-329.
The formal darwinism project in outline.Alan Grafen - 2014 - Biology and Philosophy 29 (2):155-174.
Historical development of the concept of the Gene.Petter Portin - 2002 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 27 (3):257 – 286.
What is a Gene? From molecules to metaphysics.Holmes Rolston - 2006 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 27 (6):471-497.
Natural genome-editing competences of viruses.Günther Witzany - 2006 - Acta Biotheoretica 54 (4):235-253.
The strategic gene.David Haig - 2012 - Biology and Philosophy 27 (4):461-479.
Is genomics bad for you?Benjamin Ja Dickins - 2012 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 35 (5):364-365.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-27

Downloads
32 (#473,773)

6 months
7 (#350,235)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?