- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
The public understanding of science and public participation in regulated worlds
Minerva 42 (1):41-59 (2004)
Abstract
This article discusses studies and politicalinitiatives concerned with enhancing publicinvolvement in major technological decisions.It argues that such decisions should include asignificant role for the mass media, andrespect for the diverse relations betweenscience and governance. The notion of`regulated worlds' is proposed as a startingpoint in a discourse that brings together themass media, science management, anddeliberative democracyMy notes
Similar books and articles
The Broad Challenge of Public Engagement in Science.Rinie Est - 2011 - Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (4):639-648.
The Broad Challenge of Public Engagement in Science: Commentary on: “Constitutional Moments in Governing Science and Technology”.Rinie van Est - 2011 - Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (4):639-648.
Representations of nanotechnology in norwegian newspapers — implications for public participation.Kamilla Lein Kjølberg - 2009 - NanoEthics 3 (1):61-72.
Assessing project approval procedures as formalised forms of public participation.Michael Zschiesche - 2012 - Poiesis and Praxis 9 (1-2):145-156.
What Silence Knows – Planning, Public Participation and Environmental Values.Anna Davies - 2001 - Environmental Values 10 (1):77-102.
YUTPA as a design tool for public participation.Maurice Berix - 2012 - AI and Society 27 (1):165-172.
Experimenting with Engagement: Commentary on: Taking Our Own Medicine: On an Experiment in Science Communication.Bruce V. Lewenstein - 2011 - Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (4):817-821.
Erratum to: The ethics of 'public understanding of ethics'—why and how bioethics expertise should include public and patients' voices.Silke Schicktanz, Mark Schweda & Brian Wynne - 2012 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 15 (2):251-251.
Why scientists should cooperate with journalists.Boyce Rensberger - 2000 - Science and Engineering Ethics 6 (4):549-552.
Genomics and Public Involvement: Giving Justifications Their Due.Gabriele Badano - 2012 - Studies in Ethics, Law, and Technology 6 (1).
Analytics
Added to PP
2013-12-01
Downloads
23 (#666,649)
6 months
12 (#202,587)
2013-12-01
Downloads
23 (#666,649)
6 months
12 (#202,587)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
The Co-production of Science, Ethics, and Emotion.Martyn Pickersgill - 2012 - Science, Technology, and Human Values 37 (6):579-603.
A Cultural Political Economy of Research and Innovation in an Age of Crisis.David Tyfield - 2012 - Minerva 50 (2):149-167.
Processes of Inclusion, Cultures of Calculation, Structures of Power: Scientific Citizenship and the Royal Commission on Genetic Modification.Joanna Goven - 2006 - Science, Technology, and Human Values 31 (5):565-598.
Critiquing imaginaries of ‘the public’ in UK dialogue around animal research: Insights from the Mass Observation Project.Renelle McGlacken & Pru Hobson-West - 2022 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 91 (C):280-287.
Revisiting “Upstream Public Engagement”: from a Habermasian Perspective.Xi Wang - 2016 - NanoEthics 10 (1):63-74.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-7c76586df8-pp8v9 uwo