Abstract
The article focuses on Oakeshott’s attempt to maintain a categorial distinction between political philosophy and normative prescription. It accepts the thrust of Oakeshott’s argument against rationalism in politics, but contends that the residual normative dimension in Oakeshott’s thinking should not be dismissed as philosophically irrelevant. The article takes seriously the practical demands made on agents in difficult circumstances. It focuses specifically on what may be said to be going on when we ‘pursue intimations’. By concentrating on what Oakeshott actually does (rather than what he claims to be doing) the article places Oakeshott much closer to the mainstream in western political philosophy
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1177/1474885105048046
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,489
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Oakeshott on Practice, Normative Thought and Political Philosophy.Davide Orsi - 2015 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 23 (3):545-568.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-11-02

Total views
73 ( #159,671 of 2,520,785 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #405,623 of 2,520,785 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes