Why is There Philosophy of Mathematics at All?

New York: Cambridge University Press (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This truly philosophical book takes us back to fundamentals - the sheer experience of proof, and the enigmatic relation of mathematics to nature. It asks unexpected questions, such as 'what makes mathematics mathematics?', 'where did proof come from and how did it evolve?', and 'how did the distinction between pure and applied mathematics come into being?' In a wide-ranging discussion that is both immersed in the past and unusually attuned to the competing philosophical ideas of contemporary mathematicians, it shows that proof and other forms of mathematical exploration continue to be living, evolving practices - responsive to new technologies, yet embedded in permanent facts about human beings. It distinguishes several distinct types of application of mathematics, and shows how each leads to a different philosophical conundrum. Here is a remarkable body of new philosophical thinking about proofs, applications, and other mathematical activities.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Towards a Philosophy of Applied Mathematics.Christopher Pincock - 2009 - In Otávio Bueno & Øystein Linnebo (eds.), New Waves in Philosophy of Mathematics. Palgrave-Macmillan.
Why is there Philosophy of Mathematics AT ALL?Ian Hacking - 2011 - South African Journal of Philosophy 30 (1):1-15.
Realism in mathematics.Penelope Maddy - 1990 - New York: Oxford University Prress.
Proof, Logic and Formalization.Michael Detlefsen (ed.) - 1992 - London, England: Routledge.
Arguing Around Mathematical Proofs.Michel Dufour - 2013 - In Andrew Aberdein & Ian J. Dove (eds.), The Argument of Mathematics. Dordrecht: Springer. pp. 61-76.
What the foundationalist filter kept out.Alexander Paseau - 2005 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 36 (1):191-201.
Proof in Mathematics: An Introduction.James Franklin - 1996 - Sydney, Australia: Quakers Hill Press.
Reflections on mathematics.Edward N. Zalta - 2007 - In V. F. Hendricks & Hannes Leitgeb (eds.), Philosophy of Mathematics: Five Questions. Automatic Press/VIP.
Proofs and arguments: The special case of mathematics.Jean Paul Van Bendegem - 2005 - Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 84 (1):157-169.
From philosophical to mathematical inquiry in the classroom.Nadia Kennedy - 2007 - Childhood and Philosophy 3 (6):289-311.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-09-10

Downloads
19 (#753,814)

6 months
6 (#431,022)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Ian Hacking
University of Toronto, St. George Campus

Citations of this work

Replies to Rosen, Leiter, and Dutilh Novaes.Justin Clarke-Doane - 2023 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 107 (3):817-837.
The mind, the lab, and the field: Three kinds of populations in scientific practice.Rasmus Grønfeldt Winther, Ryan Giordano, Michael D. Edge & Rasmus Nielsen - 2015 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 52:12-21.
The philosophy of computer science.Raymond Turner - 2013 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

View all 21 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references