Karl Popper in exile: The viennese progressive imagination and the making of the open society

Philosophy of the Social Sciences 26 (4):452-492 (1996)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article explores the impact of Popper's exile on the formation of The Open Society. It proposes homelessness as a major motif in Popper's life and work. His emigration from clerical-fascist Austria, sojourn in New Zealand during World War II, and social isolation in postwar England constituted a permanent exile. In cosmopolitan philosophy, he searched for a new home. His unended quest issued in a liberal cosmopolitan vision of scientific and political communities pursuing truth and reform. The Open Society was their embodiment. As described, it expressed the ideals of fin-de-siècle Viennese progressives. Many progressives were assimilated Jews, whose dilemmas of national identity gave rise to cosmopolitan views that stripped ethnicity and nationality of significance. The Open Society was an admirable defense of liberalism against fascism, but it remained a utopian ideal. It could not provide a surrogate community or home where Popper might have reached his destination and rested.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

After The open society: selected social and political writings.Karl R. Popper - 2008 - New York: Routledge. Edited by Jeremy Shearmur & Piers Norris Turner.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
54 (#283,495)

6 months
3 (#902,269)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Celebrating the open society.Joseph Agassi - 1997 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 27 (4):486-525.

Add more citations

References found in this work

What is dialectic?Karl R. Popper - 1940 - Mind 49 (196):403-426.
The Counter-Revolution of Science. [REVIEW]W. J. H. Sprott - 1953 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 4 (15):246-248.

Add more references