How inevitable are the results of successful science?
Philosophy of Science 67 (3):71 (2000)
Abstract
Obviously we could have failed to be successful scientists. But a serious question lurks beneath the banal one stated in my title. If the results of a scientific investigation are correct, would any investigation of roughly the same subject matter, if successful, at least implicitly contain or imply the same results? Using examples ranging from immunology to high-energy physics, the paper presents the cases for both positive and negative answers. The paper is deliberately non-conclusive, arguing that the question is one of the few serious philosophical issues that divides protagonists in the "science wars."Author's Profile
DOI
10.1086/392809
My notes
Similar books and articles
Ethical climate and the link between success and ethical behavior: An empirical investigation of a non-profit organization. [REVIEW]Satish P. Deshpande - 1996 - Journal of Business Ethics 15 (3):315 - 320.
Franklin, Holmes, and the epistemology of computer simulation.Wendy S. Parker - 2008 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 22 (2):165 – 183.
Simulating many-body models in physics: Rigorous results, 'benchmarks', and cross-model justification.Axel Gelfert - unknown
Dynamics of Theory Change: The Role of Predictions.Stephen G. Brush - 1994 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1994:133 - 145.
What rests on what? The proof-theoretic analysis of mathematics.Solomon Feferman - 1993 - In J. Czermak (ed.), Philosophy of Mathematics. Hölder-Pichler-Tempsky. pp. 1--147.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
162 (#79,424)
6 months
6 (#133,416)
2009-01-28
Downloads
162 (#79,424)
6 months
6 (#133,416)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Robustness, Reliability, and Overdetermination (1981).William C. Wimsatt - 2012 - In Characterizing the Robustness of Science. pp. 61-78.
Hacking’s historical epistemology: a critique of styles of reasoning.Martin Kusch - 2010 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 41 (2):158-173.
State of the field: Are the results of science contingent or inevitable?Katherina Kinzel - 2015 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 52:55-66.
Inevitability, contingency, and epistemic humility.Ian James Kidd - 2016 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 55:12-19.
References found in this work
Constructing Quarks: A Sociological History of Particle Physics.Andrew Pickering - 1990 - Synthese 82 (1):163-174.