Synthese 200 (1):1-23 (2022)

Joshua Habgood-Coote
University of Leeds
How should we measure knowledge? According to the Counting Approach, we can measure knowledge by counting pieces of knowledge. Versions of the Counting Approach that try to measure knowledge by counting true beliefs with suitable support or by counting propositions known run into problems, stemming from infinite numbers of propositions and beliefs, difficulties in individuating propositions and beliefs, and cases in which knowing the same number of propositions contributes differently to knowledge. In this paper I develop a novel question-relative and contextualist version of the counting approach, which measures an agent's knowledge by counting the number of complete answers of a contextually salient issue they can rule out. The question-relative and contextualist version of the Counting Approach avoids the issues for the proposition and belief-based systems, and offers a general, systematic, and explanatory system for measuring knowledge.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11229-022-03594-1
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Accuracy and the Laws of Credence.Richard Pettigrew - 2016 - Oxford University Press UK.
Knowledge and Practical Interests.Jason Stanley - 2005 - Oxford University Press.
Probabilistic Knowledge.Sarah Moss - 2018 - Oxford University Press.
Aboutness.Stephen Yablo - 2014 - Princeton University Press.
Elusive Knowledge.David K. Lewis - 1996 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 74 (4):549 – 567.

View all 64 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Knowing‐Wh and Embedded Questions.Ted Parent - 2014 - Philosophy Compass 9 (2):81-95.
Knowing How, What and That.Nathan Brett - 1974 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 4 (2):293 - 300.
Knowing-That, Knowing-How, or Knowing-To?Yong Huang - 2017 - Journal of Philosophical Research 42:65-94.
Questions and Answers.Henry Hiz - 1907 - The Classical Review 21 (7):220-220.
Knowing How and Knowing Answers.David Braun - 2012 - Philosophical Inquiry 36 (1-2):244.
Knowledge-How, Abilities, and Questions.Joshua Habgood-Coote - 2019 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 97 (1):86-104.
The Generality Problem for Intellectualism.Joshua Habgood-Coote - 2018 - Mind and Language 33 (3):242-262.
Knowing What I Have Done.Matthias Haase - 2018 - Manuscrito 41 (4):195-253.
Knowing That, Knowing How, and Knowing to Do.Refeng Tang - 2011 - Frontiers of Philosophy in China 6 (3):426-442.
Knowing How, Knowing That, Knowing Technology.Per Norström - 2015 - Philosophy and Technology 28 (4):553-565.


Added to PP index

Total views
128 ( #91,272 of 2,507,015 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
128 ( #5,275 of 2,507,015 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes