Bioethics 29 (4):241-250 (2015)

Thomas Douglas
Oxford University
Chris Gyngell
Australian National University
Reproductive genetic technologies allow parents to decide whether their future children will have or lack certain genetic predispositions. A popular model that has been proposed for regulating access to RGTs is the ‘genetic supermarket’. In the genetic supermarket, parents are free to make decisions about which genes to select for their children with little state interference. One possible consequence of the genetic supermarket is that collective action problems will arise: if rational individuals use the genetic supermarket in isolation from one another, this may have a negative effect on society as a whole, including future generations. In this article we argue that RGTs targeting height, innate immunity, and certain cognitive traits could lead to collective action problems. We then discuss whether this risk could in principle justify state intervention in the genetic supermarket. We argue that there is a plausible prima facie case for the view that such state intervention would be justified and respond to a number of arguments that might be adduced against that view
Keywords enhancement  reproduction  genetic selection  collective action problems  genetics
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/bioe.12098
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Anarchy, State, and Utopia.Robert Nozick - 1974 - Philosophy 52 (199):102-105.
Διήφυσε.T. L. Agar - 1897 - The Classical Review 11 (09):445-447.
Human Enhancement and Sexual Dimorphism.Rob Sparrow - 2012 - Bioethics 26 (9):464-475.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

What It’s Like to Be Good.John Harris - 2012 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 21 (3):293-305.

View all 12 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
105 ( #112,867 of 2,518,878 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
10 ( #72,069 of 2,518,878 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes