Richard Swinburne, the existence of God, and principle P

Sophia 48 (4):393-398 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Swinburne relies on principle P in The Existence of God to argue that God is simple and thus likely to exist. In this paper, I argue that Swinburne does not support P. In particular, his arguments from mathematical simplicity and scientists’ preferences both fail. Given the central role P plays in Swinburne’s overall argument in The Existence of God , I conclude that Swinburne should further support P if his argument that God likely exists is to be persuasive.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 74,569

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-07-04

Downloads
93 (#130,822)

6 months
1 (#418,511)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

The Intrinsic Probability of Grand Explanatory Theories.Ted Poston - 2020 - Faith and Philosophy 37 (4):401-420.
Beyond Belief : On the Nature and Rationality of Agnostic Religion.Carl-Johan Palmqvist - 2020 - Printed in Sweden by Media-Tryck, Lund University.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Epistemic Justification.Richard Swinburne - 2001 - Oxford University Press.
The Existence of God.Richard Swinburne - 2004 - Oxford University Press.
Simplicity as Evidence of Truth.Richard Swinburne - 1997 - Milwaukee: Marquette University Press.
Swinburne's Explanation of the Universe. [REVIEW]Quentin Smith - 1998 - Religious Studies 34 (1):91-102.

View all 6 references / Add more references