Human Nature 20 (2):151-183 (2009)
AbstractChildren may be viewed as public goods whereby both parents receive equal genetic benefits yet one parent often invests more heavily than the other. We introduce a microeconomic framework for understanding household investment decisions to address questions concerning conflicts of interest over types and amount of work effort among married men and women. Although gains and costs of marriage may not be spread equally among marriage partners, marriage is still a favorable, efficient outcome under a wide range of conditions. This bioeconomic framework subsumes both cooperative and conflictive views on the sexual division of labor. We test hypotheses concerning marriage markets, assortative mating, and men’s labor motivations among Tsimane forager-horticulturalists of Bolivia and find that: (1) men and women both value work effort in marital partners, (2) marital labor contributions are complementary, (3) work effort is correlated between spouses, (4) total production is correlated with total reproduction, and (5) better hunters have higher fitness gains within marital unions
Similar books and articles
Analytical Marxism and the Division of Labor.Renzo Llorente - 2006 - Science and Society 70 (2):232 - 251.
Parental Well-Being and the Sexual Division of Household Labor: A New Look at Gendered Families in Japan.Barbara Holthus & Hiromi Tanaka - 2013 - .
Group Structure and Female Cooperative Networks in Australia’s Western Desert.Brooke Scelza & Rebecca Bliege Bird - 2008 - Human Nature 19 (3):231-248.
Sexual selection, the division of labor, and the evolution of sex differences.David C. Geary - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (3):444-447.
Kant on sex and marriage: The implications for the same-sex marriage debate.Matthew C. Altman - 2010 - Kant Studien 101 (3):309-330.
Mill, Political Economy, and Women's Work.Nancy J. Hirschmann - 2008 - American Political Science Review 102 (2):199-203.
Self Organization and Adaptation in Insect Societies.Robert E. Page & Sandra D. Mitchell - 1990 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1990:289 - 298.
Back to the future: Marriage as friendship in the thought of Mary wollstonecraft.Ruth Abbey - 1999 - Hypatia 14 (3):78-95.
HIV status and age at first marriage among women in Cameroon.Timothy Adair - 2008 - Journal of Biosocial Science 40 (5):743-760.
Public or Private Good? The Contested Meaning of Marriage.Brook J. Sadler - 2010 - Social Philosophy Today 26:23-38.
Differences in male and female cognitive abilities: Sexual selection or division of labor?Michael T. Ghiselin - 1996 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19 (2):254-255.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Sex Differences in Disgust: Why Are Women More Easily Disgusted Than Men?Laith Al-Shawaf, David M. G. Lewis & David M. Buss - 2018 - Emotion Review 10 (2):149-160.
No Sex or Age Difference in Dead-Reckoning Ability among Tsimane Forager-Horticulturalists.Benjamin C. Trumble, Steven J. C. Gaulin, Matt D. Dunbar, Hillard Kaplan & Michael Gurven - 2016 - Human Nature 27 (1):51-67.
Opportunities for Interaction.Tanya Broesch, Patrick L. Carolan, Senay Cebioğlu, Chris von Rueden, Adam Boyette, Cristina Moya, Barry Hewlett & Michelle A. Kline - 2021 - Human Nature 32 (1):208-238.
The Foundation of Kinship.Donna L. Leonetti & Benjamin Chabot-Hanowell - 2011 - Human Nature 22 (1-2):16-40.
References found in this work
Causality: Models, Reasoning and Inference.Judea Pearl - 2000 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 64 (1):201-202.
“Economic man” in cross-cultural perspective: Behavioral experiments in 15 small-scale societies.Joseph Henrich, Robert Boyd, Samuel Bowles, Colin Camerer, Ernst Fehr, Herbert Gintis, Richard McElreath, Michael Alvard, Abigail Barr, Jean Ensminger, Natalie Smith Henrich, Kim Hill, Francisco Gil-White, Michael Gurven, Frank W. Marlowe & John Q. Patton - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (6):795-815.