Ātman (Self) and _Anātman_ (No-Self): A Possible Reconciliation

Abstract

In most common expositions of Indian philosophy the two traditions: self and no-self - are taken to be mutually incompatible. The former, having its origin in the Upaniṣads, finds expression in all āstikadarśanas , though its clearest and most important exposition is found in Advaita Vedānta. The latter having its origin in the teachings of the Buddha finds varied expressions in different schools of Buddhism. The Advaita Vedānta accepts ātman and rejects anattā ; the Buddhists argue for anattā and reject ātman . My exposition in this paper is based primarily on the teachings of the Gautama Buddha and Śaṃkara, the founders of Buddhism and Advaita Vedānta respectively. Accordingly, unless otherwise specified, my use of the terms “Buddhist” and “Advaitins” refers to the teachings of these founders rather than to the later philosophers of these two traditions. I will begin with an overview of Advaita Vedānta

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Consciousness and Brahman-atman.Mark B. Woodhouse - 1978 - The Monist 61 (January):109-124.
Bhāmatī and Vivaraṇa schools of Advaita Vedānta: a critical approach.Pulasth Soobah Roodurmum - 2002 - Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass Publishers. Edited by Kanshi Ram.
Samkhya and Advaita Vedanta.Anima Sen Gupta - 1973 - Lucknow,: Monoranjan Sen; also available at Sanskrit Pustak Bhandar, Calcutta.
The vision of self in early Vedānta.William Beidler - 1975 - Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-04-07

Downloads
83 (#198,631)

6 months
1 (#1,510,037)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Buddhist Philosophy: A Historical Analysis.David J. Kalupahana - 1978 - Philosophical Review 87 (2):316-319.
Sokrates–buddha.Edmund Husserl - 2010 - Husserl Studies 26 (1):1-17.

View all 6 references / Add more references