‘Opinion in Eighteenth-Century Thought: What did the Concept Purport to Explain?’: J. A. W. Gunn

Utilitas 5 (1):17-33 (1993)
  Copy   BIBTEX


We all ‘know’ that public opinion came to prominence in the political vocabulary of the late eighteenth century. It may be that this dates its rise a bit late, but it is not relevant to argue the matter here. My concern is rather that we be equally aware of the purposes for which people made use of the concept. Here I wish to consider various possible contexts for speaking or writing of public opinion, or ‘opinion’, as it was usually called prior to the mid-eighteenth century. It may be possible to define, more fully than heretofore, the work that the expression did in eighteenth-century thought. As contemporary students of public opinion have been learning, an answer to this question may not even be wholly irrelevant to the task of specifying the nature of public opinion in our own time.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 86,605

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

On the Public.Alastair Hannay - 2005 - Routledge.
The political education of John Zaller.Larry M. Bartels - 2012 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 24 (4):463-488.
The role of public opinion in Rousseau's conception of property.E. Putterman - 1999 - History of Political Thought 20 (3):417-437.
What is public opinion?Eric R. A. N. Smith - 1996 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 10 (1):95-105.
What wrongdoers deserve: the moral reasoning behind responses to misconduct.R. Murray Thomas - 1993 - Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press. Edited by Ann Diver-Stamnes.


Added to PP

79 (#181,826)

6 months
4 (#248,348)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Hume: Theory of Politics.D. Daiches Raphael & Frederick Watkins - 1951 - Philosophical Quarterly 1 (5):461.

Add more references