Anomie’s Eastern origins: The Buddha’s indirect influence on Durkheim’s understanding of desire and suffering
European Journal of Social Theory 19 (3):355-373 (2016)
AbstractDurkheim’s claim in Suicide that humanity’s ‘inextinguishable thirst’ causes suffering was adopted from Arthur Schopenhauer’s argument that the will-to-live’s ‘unquenchable thirst’ causes suffering, which was previously adopted from the Buddha’s argument that ‘ceaselessly recurring thirst’ causes suffering. This article retraces this demonstrable though seemingly unlikely history of ideas and reveals that the philosophical underpinnings of Durkheim’s theory of anomie are rooted, through Schopenhauer, whose thought influenced many thinkers during the Neo-Romantic fin de siècle period, including Durkheim, in the Buddha’s Second Noble Truth – a doctrine made available to Schopenhauer in European translations of Buddhist texts during the previous turn of the century’s ‘Oriental Renaissance’. By achieving a more thorough understanding of the ambiguous concept of anomie through its Eastern intellectual origins, this project shows that the common conceptualization of anomie as ‘normlessness’ is inconsequential without presupposing that humans thirst and unconstrained thirst causes pain.
Similar books and articles
Turning Anomie on its Head: Fatalism as Durkheim's Concealed and Multidimensional Alienation Theory.Gabriel A. Acevedo - 2005 - Sociological Theory 23 (1):75-85.
Anomie and Fatalism in Durkheim's Theory of Regulation.Philippe Besnard - 1993 - In Stephen P. Turner (ed.), Emile Durkheim: Sociologist and Moralist. Routledge. pp. 169--90.
Análisis estructuralista de la teoría de la anomia.Cláudio Abreu - 2014 - Metatheoria 4 (2):09-22.
Rethinking the Buddha: Early Buddhist Philosophy as Meditative Perception.Eviatar Shulman - 2014 - Cambridge University Press.
How Does Mindfulness Transform Suffering? I: The Nature and Origins of Dukkha.John D. Teasdale & Michael Chaskalson - 2011 - Contemporary Buddhism 12 (1):89--102.
Anomie and the Sociology of Knowledge, in Durkheim and Today.Kurt H. Wolff - 1988 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 14 (1):53-67.
Schopenhauer and the Malaise of an Age.Jordi Cabos - 2016 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 42 (1):93-113.
“Is There A Difference?”: Iconic Images of Suffering in Buddhism and Christianity.Alan Pope - 2007 - Janus Head 10 (1):247-259.
Why the Buddha Did Not Discuss "The Problem of Free Will and Determinism".Christopher W. Gowans - 2017 - In Rick Repetti (ed.), Buddhist Perspectives on Free Will: Agentless Agency? New York: Routledge. pp. 11-21.
A Bioethical Interpretation of Buddha’s Enlightenment.Nader Ghotbi - 2015 - Eubios Journal of Asian and International Bioethics 25 (5):204-207.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
No citations found.
References found in this work
India and Europe: An Essay in Understanding.Wilhelm Halbfass - 1988 - State University of New York Press.