Why the Connection Argument Doesn’t Work

Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 55 (1):201 (1995)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,616

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Why the Connection Argument Doesn’t Work.Robert Van Gulick - 1995 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 55 (1):201-7.
Non-reductionism and John Searle’s The Rediscovery of the Mind.Brian J. Garrett & John Searle - 1995 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 55 (1):209.
A dilemma for Searle's argument for the connection principle.Kirk Ludwig - 1993 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16 (1):194-5.
Searle's chinese room argument.Larry Hauser - unknown - Field Guide to the Philosophy of Mind.
The Rediscovery of the Mind.John R. Searle - 1992 - MIT Press. Edited by Ned Block & Hilary Putnam.
Why Searle has not rediscovered the mind.David Hodgson - 1994 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 1 (2):264-274.
Feeling Fine About the Mind.Louise M. Antony - 1997 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 57 (2):381-387.
Chinese room argument.Larry Hauser - 2001 - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
The Rediscovery of the Mind.Paul F. Snowdon - 1994 - Philosophical Quarterly 44 (175):259-260.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-05-29

Downloads
35 (#396,067)

6 months
5 (#247,092)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

John R. Searle
University of California, Berkeley

Citations of this work

Searle's unconscious mind.Charles E. M. Dunlop - 2000 - Philosophical Psychology 13 (1):123-148.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references