Abstract

This reply to «Against System in Ethics», stresses both agreement and desagreement between the authoress and Griffin's point ofview.There is an argument for a strong link between the prudential and the moral, as well as for the relevance of personal excelence and personal flourishing. However there is a propossal here to make personal, individual, flourishing dependent on sympathetic feelings and a broad frame of mind so to embrace individual and personal flourishing for everybody else.Griffin's aminating aim, is brought from the background to the front now, as the authoress believes that general benevolence frees every single person from petty feelings and misery (moral and otherwise)