On the action of social groups

Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 19 (1-4):443 – 454 (1976)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper deals with the question of whether and when it is appropriate or inappropriate to say that a social group performs an action. After some remarks on the concept of action three kinds of groups are distinguished, i.e. assemblies, institutions, and classes. It is found that in the first two of these cases predication of action is possible: an assembly can act in that all its members act, or some of them do who are interchangeable with any others; and an institution can act because it has a structure and some individuals can act on its behalf. A class, however, cannot be said to act, for its concept may be freely formed, its members cannot be assembled, and it has no organs through which actions could be performed

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A dialectical approach to action theory.John M. Connolly - 1976 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 19 (1-4):427 – 442.
The importance of us: a philosophical study of basic social notions.Raimo Tuomela - 1995 - Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.
On Groups, Group Action and Preferential Treatment.R. W. Brimlow - 1996 - Journal of Philosophical Research 21:341-376.
Free will and intentional action.L. S. Carrier - 1986 - Philosophia 16 (3-4):355-364.
Consciousness in act and action.Keith Hossack - 2003 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 2 (3):187-203.
I. on the action of teams.David Londey - 1978 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 21 (1-4):213 – 218.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-30

Downloads
23 (#661,981)

6 months
5 (#652,053)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?